Florida A&M
Men - Women
2012 - 2013 - 2014
Switch to All-time Team Page
RankNameGradeRating
923  Effiey Kosgei SO 21:28
1,414  QuanDra Shanks FR 21:59
1,422  Cynthia Chelelgo SO 22:00
2,100  Chandelic Jackson SR 22:42
2,381  Zenia George SR 23:01
2,975  Phyllis Cheruiyot FR 23:48
3,202  Ciera Williams JR 24:20
National Rank #232 of 340
South Region Rank #28 of 47
Chance of Advancing to Nationals 0.0%
Most Likely Finish 24th at Regional


National Champion 0.0%
Top 5 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 10 at Nationals 0.0%
Top 20 at Nationals 0.0%


Regional Champion 0.0%
Top 5 in Regional 0.0%
Top 10 in Regional 0.0%
Top 20 in Regional 6.6%


Race Performance Ratings


Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.


RaceDateTeam Rating Effiey Kosgei QuanDra Shanks Cynthia Chelelgo Chandelic Jackson Zenia George Phyllis Cheruiyot Ciera Williams
Greater Louisville Classic (Blue) 10/05 1343 21:36 22:09 22:06 24:33 23:38 24:27
FSU Invitational 10/11 1276 21:50 22:24 22:19 22:21 23:03 25:16 24:33
MEAC Championships 10/26 978 20:15 20:34 20:54 21:51 21:46 22:14 23:23





NCAA Tournament Simulation


Based on results of 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament. Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.



Team Results

Advances to RoundAve FinishAve Score Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
NCAA Championship 0.0%
Region Championship 100% 24.5 679 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.2 0.5 0.8 1.7 3.2 7.0 12.5 13.5 13.6 12.4 10.6 8.3 5.8 4.6 2.7 1.5



NCAA Tournament Simulation - Individual Results



RegionalAve Finish Finishing Place
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25
Effiey Kosgei 82.9 0.0
QuanDra Shanks 121.8
Cynthia Chelelgo 122.0
Chandelic Jackson 165.3
Zenia George 185.5
Phyllis Cheruiyot 231.9
Ciera Williams 254.8




NCAA Championship Selection Detail

Total
Region Finish Chance of Finishing Chance of Advancing Auto At Large Selection No Adv Auto At Large Region Finish
1 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13
1 1
2 2
3 3
4 4
5 5
6 6
7 7
8 8
9 9
10 10
11 11
12 12
13 0.0% 0.0 13
14 0.1% 0.1 14
15 0.1% 0.1 15
16 0.2% 0.2 16
17 0.5% 0.5 17
18 0.8% 0.8 18
19 1.7% 1.7 19
20 3.2% 3.2 20
21 7.0% 7.0 21
22 12.5% 12.5 22
23 13.5% 13.5 23
24 13.6% 13.6 24
25 12.4% 12.4 25
26 10.6% 10.6 26
27 8.3% 8.3 27
28 5.8% 5.8 28
29 4.6% 4.6 29
30 2.7% 2.7 30
31 1.5% 1.5 31
32 0.8% 0.8 32
33 0.1% 0.1 33
34 34
35 35
36 36
37 37
38 38
39 39
40 40
41 41
42 42
43 43
44 44
45 45
46 46
47 47
Total 100% 0.0% 100.0 0.0 0.0




Points



At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection. Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 5,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.



Received By BeatingChance ReceivedAverage If >0Average
Morgan State 0.1% 1.0 0.0
Hampton 0.0% 1.0 0.0
Total 0.0
Minimum 0.0
Maximum 1.0